|
Purpose: The objective of this study was to determine the probabilities of transition of stages in the natural history of cervical cancer by conducting a formal meta-analysis of published studies of the topic.
Methods: We identified health states of interest in the natural history of cervical pre-cancer, identified all possible papers from MEDLINE (years 1966-2002) that met selection criteria, developed relevance and acceptability criteria for inclusion, then thoroughly reviewed the selected studies. Four transitions were investigated in detail: (1) high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HGSIL) to cancer, (2) low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LGSIL) to HGSIL, (3) HGSIL to LGSIL, and (4) LGSIL to normal. We converted data to determine 6-month transition probabilities, as this is the time frame for follow-up after an abnormal Papanicolaou smear. To determine the transition probability data we used a random effects model that assumed the parameters were drawn from a gamma distribution.
Results: 28 studies were found that met acceptability and relevance criteria; not all studies provided data for all 4 health-state transitions. Our final analysis included 9 studies for HGSIL to cancer (follow-up 0-336 months), 12 studies for LGSIL to HGSIL (follow-up 0-76 months), 3 studies for HGSIL to LGSIL (follow-up 0-132 months), and 12 studies for LGSIL to normal (follow-up 0-77 months). The homogeneity test failed for each transition under investigation, i.e. the studies were not homogeneous. The 6-month mean predictive transition probability (95% confidence intervals with “prediction interval” in parentheses) for HGSIL to cancer was 0.0037 (0.00004, 0.03386); for LGSIL to HGSIL was 0.0362 (0.00055, 0.23220); for HGSIL to LGSIL was 0.0282 (0.00027, 0.35782); and for LGSIL to normal was 0.0740 (0.00119, 0.42672).
Conclusion: The transition probabilities between cervical cancer health states for 6-month intervals are small. However, there was significant variation in the probabilities for the various health-state transitions. The results of this study, when used in a decision-analytic model for cervical cancer screening, will have to undergo extensive sensitivity analysis.
See more of Poster Session - Clinical Strategies; Judgment and Decison Making
See more of The 26th Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making (October 17-20, 2004)