Meeting Brochure and registration form      SMDM Homepage

Monday, 24 October 2005
11

THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ANTIBIOTIC USE AT SURGICAL ABORTION BY AGE AND DESIRE FOR FUTURE CHILDBEARING

Matthew F. Reeves, MD1, Kenneth J. Smith, MD2, and Mitchell D. Creinin1. (1) University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, (2) University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Purpose: Although studies suggest that antibiotics around the time of early surgical abortion reduce infection rates, most studies were performed at centers where infection was diagnosed in >5% of women receiving antibiotics. No major publications from North America have reported infections rates higher that 1%. Additionally, long-term outcomes are not generally evaluated in trials of antibiotic use at abortion. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis to examine the benefits and consequences of using antibiotic prophylaxis in a range of high to low risk settings.

Methods: A Markov model of antibiotic side-effects, infection and infection sequelae (ectopic, chronic pain, & infertility) was developed. Three options were considered: no antibiotics, prophylactic antibiotics (pre-abortion single-dose), and treatment-dose antibiotics (post-abortion multiple-dose). The base case assumed a 2% infection rate and a 25% side-effect rate. Four models were run using either 20-year-old or 30-year-old women who do or do not desire children in the future. One-way, two-way, and Monte Carlo sensitivity analyses were performed. A $50,000 per QALY cost-effectiveness threshold was used.

Results: For a 20 or 30-year old woman desiring future fertility, no antibiotic is favored if the baseline infection risk is <0.8% or <0.9%, respectively. Treatment-dose antibiotics are favored if the risk of infection exceeds 4.7% or 5.7%, respectively. Otherwise, prophylactic antibiotics are favored for women desiring future fertility. For a 20 or 30-year old woman not desiring future fertility, no antibiotic is favored if the baseline infection risk is <0.9 % or <1.1%, respectively. Treatment-dose antibiotics are favored if the risk of infection exceeds 5.7% or 6.6%, respectively. Otherwise, prophylactic antibiotics are favored. Results were sensitive to varying relative infection risk between prophylactic and treatment regimens and the rate of side-effects but were robust to variation of other cost and outcome parameters.

Conclusions: Although age and desire for fertility influence the cost-effectiveness of antibiotic use, further study is needed to examine antibiotic use in settings with a low incidence of post-abortal infection and to compare prophylactic and treatment regimens directly. Further delineation of the sequelae of post-abortal infection is also needed.


See more of Poster Session III
See more of The 27th Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making (October 21-24, 2005)