Meeting Brochure and registration form      SMDM Homepage

Sunday, October 21, 2007
P1-21

UNDERSTANDING INDIVIDUAL QUALITY OF LIFE INDICATORS TO IMPROVE CARE FOR PERSONS WITH CHRONIC MENTAL ILLNESS

Martha Shumway, PhD1, Melissa Moore, PhD2, and Jennifer Alvidrez, Ph.D.1. (1) Psychiatry Department, San Francisco, USA, (2) Family Service Agency of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

PURPOSE: Increasing the patient-centeredness of care can enhance quality of care and improve outcomes for persons with chronic illness. As a first step in improving the quality and client-centeredness of care for persons with chronic mental illness, this study elicited individual quality of life (QOL) indicators, measured QOL on those indicators, and compared the indicators to clinician-recorded treatment goals.

METHODS: 22 persons with mental illness residing in community Residential Care Facilities (RCFs) completed the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW), generated 5 individual QOL indicators, rated the importance of each indicator, and rated their associated QOL. Investigators identified 9 domains of indicators in participants' responses: Interpersonal Relationships, Activities/Hobbies, Basic Living Needs, Money/Finances, Health, Spirituality/Religion, Identity/Values, Services/Treatment and Work/School. Treatment goals from participants' clinical records were categorized into the same domains and compared to participants' QOL indicators.

RESULTS: Participants' RCF tenure averaged 7 years. Their mean age was 49. 64% were male. 55% were white, 27% Asian-American and 14% African-American. 72 unique QOL indicators were elicited from participants. The most frequently elicited domains were Interpersonal Relationships (22%) and Activities/Hobbies (17%). The least frequently elicited domains were Services/Treatment (6%) and Work/School (6%). Domains were rated similarly in importance. On a 100-point scale, where 100 reflects the best possible QOL, mean QOL was highest for Identity/Values (82) and Health (75) and lowest for Interpersonal Relationships (53) and Spirituality/Religion (48). Participants' mean ratings of their overall QOL was 71. The domains most frequently observed in clinician-recorded treatment goals were Services/Treatment (28%) and Interpersonal Relationships (17%); the least frequent were Money/Finances (9%) and Activities/Hobbies (7%).

CONCLUSIONS: Participants rated their QOL relatively positively, but gave low ratings to their QOL in Interpersonal Relationships, the most frequently elicited domain. Participants' QOL indicators were not well represented in clinician-recorded treatment goals. Most notably, clinician-recorded goals emphasized the process of mental health treatment, while residents rarely identified treatment as a QOL indicator. Participants frequently identified activities and hobbies as a QOL indicator, but that domain was not common in clinician-recorded goals. Findings suggest that identifying client-specific QOL indicators and incorporating them in treatment planning could improve the quality and client-centeredness of care for persons with chronic mental illness.