Methods: Using a Markov model, we separately estimated the cost-effectiveness of single- and multiple-dose PPV strategies in 65-, 75-, and 80-year-old cohorts. National Health Interview Survey data were used to segment cohorts by comorbidity. Age- and comorbidity-specific invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) rates were obtained from the CDC. IPD costs were obtained from HCUP and utilities from the medical literature; an expert panel estimated PPV-related protection from IPD based on age, comorbidity, and time since vaccination. Costs (in 2003 Results: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) for non-dominated strategies in each age cohort are summarized below. A single PPV at age 65 was economically reasonable, while vaccinations at ages 75 and 80 were more expensive, particularly when multiple vaccination strategies were considered. Results were most sensitive to individual variation of vaccine effectiveness estimates. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses, where parameters were simultaneously varied over distributions 3000 times, supported baseline results. When we assumed both prior vaccination and 80% effectiveness of subsequent PPVs, base case ICERs increased by 29-34% for single dose strategies and 37-133% for strategies with multiple subsequent PPVs. Conclusion: Depending on the cost-effectiveness acceptability threshold, single dose PPV strategies are worth considering for IPD prevention for patients aged 65-80 from clinical and economic standpoints. Multiple PPV strategies are more expensive, particularly when prior vaccination and the possibility of vaccine tolerance are considered. Cohort age Vaccination age ICER 65 65 $26,100 65 75 $88,400 65 70 75 80 $188,000 75 75 $71,300 75 85 $92,700 80 80 $75,800 80 85 $548,000
See more of: 30th Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making (October 19-22, 2008)