Methods: For the years 1998-2005 we collected data from two sources: 1) incidence of cancer in the state of Results: Participation rates calculated using data from CTCG trials showed low participation rates (mean 0.75%, st.dev. 0.15%) over the 8 years of the study, with no obvious trends over time in rates. Regression analysis shows that there are significant differences among cancer types in participation rates, with breast and gynecologic cancer patients having the highest participation rates (p<0.001). Paired t-tests showed that African Americans and Whites did not have different rates of participation (p=0.09) but Hispanics had lower participation than non-Hispanics (p<0.05). Women had higher rates than men (p<0.001). An examination of ACOS data showed that these data captured a much higher rate of participation (5.05% in 2004, 8.41% in 2005). Conclusions: Although CTCG data has been used to describe participation in cancer clinical trials, and is the only data that includes patient demographics, it has important limitations. Given the fact that many clinical trials conducted in Florida are funded from sources other than the National Cancer Institute, the higher rate of participation found in ACOS cancer data points to the need for further data collection and analysis. Nevertheless, if participation by subgroups is not biased in CTCG data, we can conclude that women and non-Hispanics are significantly more likely to participate in cancer clinical trials.
See more of: 30th Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making (October 19-22, 2008)