Methods: Patients were recruited from three liver specialist clinics in
Results: 322 patients had received antiviral therapy; after excluding patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, decompensated cirrhosis, or transplantation, 298 remained (150 responders and 148 non-responders). Non-responders were more likely to be male, unemployed, have cirrhosis and be infected with genotype 1/4 (p<0.0001). Non-responders had higher mean Charlson co-morbidity score (1.9 versus 1.3) and higher symptom severity indices (4.8 versus 2.3) (p<0.0001). No differences were observed in age, ethnicity, marital status, education level, total income from all sources, history of injection drug use and excessive alcohol consumption. Non-responders had significantly lower mean scores on the eight SF-36 domains, the four Hepatitis specific domains, and lower mean physical (41 versus 48) and mental (41 versus 46) component summary scores (p<0.01). Utilities from time trade-off (0.81 versus 0.89), HUI2 (0.73 versus 0.80) and HUI3 (0.57 versus 0.70) were lower for non-responders (p<0.0001). The regression-adjusted difference in HUI2 scores was less than 0.01 (p=0.96). Similarly, there were no differences in the HUI3 and time-tradeoff scores between responders and non-responders after adjustment for demographic and clinical variables.
Conclusion: Patients with a sustained response to antiviral therapy for chronic HCV infection have better quality of life than non-responders. In our population, the difference in quality of life measures appears to be explained by differences in demographics, comorbidity and symptoms.
See more of: 30th Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making (October 19-22, 2008)