DECIDEO : INFORMED DECISION AND PARTICIPATION OF WOMEN TO THE NATIONAL SCREENING FOR BREAST CANCER : A QUALITATIVE OVERVIEW

Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Grand Ballroom AB (Hyatt Regency Chicago)
Poster Board # 22
(DEC) Decision Psychology and Shared Decision Making

Aurélie Bourmaud, MD1, Mathieu Oriol, MD2, Véronique Regnier, PhD.1, Nora Moumjid, PhD3, Patricia Soler, MD4 and Franck Chauvin, MD, PhD1, (1)Cancerology Institute of Loire and Jean Monnet University, Saint Etienne, France, (2)Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire, Saint Priest en Jarez, France, (3)Gresac - Umr 5823 Cnrs, Lyon, France, (4)ADEMAS 69, Lyon, France

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a new informed decision tool on the decision making process of women invited to the national screening for breast cancer. This new tool is a document giving a complete, accessible to all, and scientifically based information on both advantages and disadvantages of the national breast cancer screening.   

Methods: The informed decision tool (called DECIDEO booklet) was sent to 4000 women with the usual invitation to participate to the national breast screening. One month later, a panel of 400 women randomised among those 4000 was interviewed by phone with a questionnaire dealing with: -         the satisfaction concerning the help to get a decision the DECIDEO booklet brings to them -         the level of knowledge about breast cancer and screening the DECIDEO booklet brings to them -         the help through the decisional conflict the DECIDEO booklet brings to them -         characteristics of the respondents’ women including specific focus on socio-economic characteristics    

Results: 403 women aged between 50 and 74 answered the questionnaire. Among this sample, 30 % (121) of them actually read the DECIDEO booklet and 20% kept it. Among the women who read the DECIDEO booklet, 98% of them find the information given satisfactory, of good quality and sufficient to take a decision concerning the participation to national breast cancer screening. Having read the document increases the intention to participate to the national breast cancer screening by 12% (56% versus 44%, p<0,05) and increases the average knowledge about breast cancer and interest of the screening of  6 % (82,5 % versus 76,5%). Interestingly, the socio-economic level strongly affects the level of knowledge about breast cancer and screening of the overall sample (71,5% for the women of a lower socio-economic level versus 80 % for the women of a higher socio-economic level, p<0,05).   

Conclusions: The DECIDEO booklet was assessed as a satisfactory help for the decision making process by 98% of the users. It increases the knowledge level about breast cancer and screening, but mainly among the women with a high socio-economic level. The question raised is: is it the informed decision approach that is not adapted for the women of a lower socio-economic level or is it the booklet form of the tool ?