14 HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS GENOTYPE PREVALENCE IN ITALY AFTER NATIONWIDE VACCINATION: A DYNAMIC TRANSMISSION MODEL

Thursday, October 18, 2012
The Atrium (Hyatt Regency)
Poster Board # 14
Applied Health Economics (AHE)

Gabriele Accetta, PhD, ISPO Cancer Research and Prevention Institute, Florence, Italy, Lorenzo Cecconi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy, Gianpaolo Scalia-Tomba, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy and Annibale Biggeri, University of Florence and ISPO Cancer Research and Prevention Institute, Florence, Italy

Purpose: To assess the potential impact of a human papillomavirus (HPVs) 16/18 vaccination program on oncogenic HPVs prevalence in Italy.  

Method: The potential  effects of  HPV 16/18 vaccine on cervical cancer incidence will depend on how vaccination lowers oncogenic HPV prevalence throughout the population.  We developed a dynamic deterministic and non-linear model for heterosexual transmission of HPV infections to describe direct and indirect protection effects of vaccination. The model distinguishes  3 different types of HPV:  high-risk 16/18,  high-risk  non 16/18, and low-risk, and was parametrized using demographic characteristics of the Italian population and published literature on HPV. The model was calibrated to match observed  type-specific HPV prevalence. Vaccine  efficacy assumptions:  75.6%  effective in preventing  HPV 16/18 infection,  and 11% effective in preventing infection by high-risk HPV types not covered by the vaccine.

Result: At 30% vaccine coverage,  vaccinating 12-year-old girls will result in a reduction of  HPV 16/18 prevalence and in an increase of  high-risk HPV non 16/18 prevalence. Twenty years after the start of the vaccination program high-risk HPV (16/18 and non 16/18) prevalence will decrease for women <35 yrs and will increase for women >35 yrs. After sixty years the prevalence decreases for all age groups except for women aged 40-49 years (see table).
Table. High-risk  HPV  prevalence in women: endemic equilibrium distribution, 20 and 60 years after the start of the mass vaccination program (coverage 30%).
Age Equilibrium  After 20 yrs  After 60 yrs
years      %  % (variation)   % (variation) 
15-19     25.3 12.0 (-53%) 9.8 (-61%)
20-24     30.6 22.5 (-27%) 17.9 (-42%)
25-29     19.2 16.0 (-17%) 12.6 (-35%)
30-34     12.0 11.6 (-3%) 9.1 (-24%)
35-39     7.5 9.6 (+27%) 6.7 (-11%)
40-44     4.9 7.7 (+56%) 5.3 (+8%)
45-49     3.3 5.0 (+53%) 3.5 (+6%)
50-54     1.9 2.7 (+40%) 1.8 (-3%)
55-59     1.6 2.2 (+35%) 1.5 (-6%)
60-64     1.7 1.8 (+6%) 1.3 (-24%)

Conclusion: At 30% coverage, HPV 16/18 vaccination of preadolescent women will lower HPV 16/18 prevalence also among non-vaccinated women. However, the decrease in HPV 16/18 prevalence is accompanied by an increase in high-risk HPV non 16/18 prevalence in the next decades. Overall oncogenic HPV prevalence can increase or decrease depending on age group.