K-2 CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING AND HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS VACCINATION IN ITALY: A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS

Friday, October 19, 2012: 4:15 PM
Regency Ballroom C (Hyatt Regency)
Applied Health Economics (AHE)

Gabriele Accetta, PhD1, Annibale Biggeri2, Giuseppe Lippi3, Francesca Carozzi1, Massimo Confortini1, Marco Zappa1 and Eugenio Paci1, (1)ISPO Cancer Research and Prevention Institute, Florence, Italy, (2)University of Florence and ISPO Cancer Research and Prevention Institute, Florence, Italy, (3)Local Health Authority, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, Florence, Italy

Purpose: Vaccine cross-protection and the tendency to offer free-of-charge vaccination to older women demand a new evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of cervical screening and HPV vaccination in Italy. 

Method: In Italy  the non-mandatory vaccination is  available free of charge to preadolescent girls. Each region has its own vaccination program in addition to the national one.  We used our previously developed Markov model to describe the natural history of HPV infections and carcinogenesis of cervical cancer.  The  model was calibrated to fit to empirical age-specific HPV prevalence and incidence of cervical cancer observed in Italy.  We simulated 10 million individual life histories using a Monte Carlo micro simulation. If the simulated woman undergoes a preventive strategies her life history can change. These changes represent  the effects of the intervention. Strategies are defined by varying the type of first screening test, use of triage, the frequency of the screening program,  screening age. Each scenario was evaluated without vaccination, with vaccination at age 11 years or 25 years. Vaccine  assumptions:  100% coverage, 75.6%  effective against  HPV 16/18 infection,  and 11% effective against high-risk HPV non 16/18. We compared alternatives strategies  using incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Discount rate was 3%.

Result: Vaccination at age 25 years was always  dominated by strategies without vaccination. 
Table. ICER for strategies in the efficiency frontier for women who are eligible to be vaccinated at age 11 years.
Preventive strategy Vaccine Screening frequency (yrs) Screening age ICER (EURO) 
No screening, non vaccine    No       - - -
HPV DNA test+Pap test triage    No       7 30 to 65 (to 50 for negative women)    3269
HPV DNA test+Pap test triage    No        7 30 to 65          6581
HPV DNA test+Pap test triage   Yes       9 25 to 65  12656
HPV DNA test+Pap test triage   Yes       7 30 to 65  13617
HPV DNA test+Pap test triage   Yes       5 30 to 65 (to 50 for negative women)  31982
HPV DNA test+Pap test triage   Yes       3 30 to 65 (to 50 for negative women) 151732

Conclusion: Under the assumption that vaccination is ineffective in previous infected women, HPV vaccination in women aged 25 years is highly questionable and cost-ineffective. The prolongation of screening interval  as well as narrowing the screening age range for women vaccinated at 11 years of age  may be acceptable.