EFFECTIVENESS OF A CLINICAL REASONING CURRICULUM TO IMPROVE KNOWLEDGE OF APPROPRIATE ANTIBIOTIC USE

Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Key Ballroom Foyer (Hilton Baltimore)
Poster Board # P3-33
Decision Psychology and Shared Decision Making (DEC)

Vera P. Luther, MD1, John Petrocelli, PhD2, Jim Beardsley, PharmD1, Jim Johnson, PharmD1, John Williamson, PharmD1 and Christopher Ohl, MD1, (1)Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, NC, (2)Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC

Purpose: Education is essential to improve appropriate antibiotic use, but usual approaches are marginally effective and lack sustained impact.  This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a novel clinical reasoning curriculum to improve knowledge of appropriate antibiotic use among resident physicians.

Methods: A 1-year clinical reasoning curriculum was compromised of monthly, case-based conferences facilitated by an antimicrobial stewardship team. Conference structure was uniform. After a case presentation, residents were led through a reflective thought task where they generated: a general and specific assessment, a causal analysis, counterfactuals, then implications and solutions. Internal Medicine residents (IMR) participated in year 1 (n=44), Family Medicine residents (FMR) participated in year 2 (n=22). All residents continued their usual clinical and didactic training.  A 33-question “appropriate antibiotic use” knowledge exam was administered at baseline, after year 1, and after year 2. A 2 (medical specialty: IMR vs FMR) × 3 (exam score: 1st vs. 2nd vs. 3rd) repeated measures analysis of covariance was computed with exam score as within-subjects variable and residency year as a covariate.  

Results: The analysis revealed a main effect of exam score, F(2, 126) = 103.37, p < .001, h2 = .62, as well as a main effect of medical specialty such that IMR out-performed FMR, F(1, 63) = 15.61, p < .001, h2 = .20. These effects were qualified by a statistically significant medical specialty × exam score interaction, F(1, 126) = 27.23, p < .001, h2 = .30.  On pairwise analysis, 1st exam scores did not differ. However, after IMR completed the curriculum, IMR significantly outscored FMR on the 2nd exam, t(126) = 8.93, p < .001.  After FMR completed the curriculum, exam scores did not significantly differ (figure). IMR exam performance was sustained after 1 year. The conferences were well attended and course evaluations were highly favorable.  

 

Conclusions: A significant and sustained improvement in knowledge of appropriate antibiotic use among resident physicians can be achieved through a clinical reasoning curriculum that incorporates case-based reflective thought task exercises. The addition of reflective thought task exercises may be an important strategy to improve appropriate antibiotic use knowledge.