THE CLINICAL UTILITY OF NOVEL GENOMIC-BASED TEST ON MEDICAL DECISION MAKING FOR THE EVALUATION OF OBSTRUCTIVE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE IN THE AMBULATORY CARE SETTING

Monday, October 21, 2013
Key Ballroom Foyer (Hilton Baltimore)
Poster Board # P2-33
Decision Psychology and Shared Decision Making (DEC)

Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD1, Heather Lyons-Hartnett, PhD2, May Yau, MS3, Paul Rich, MD4, Dedra Newton, NP5, Kofi Bruce-Mensah, MD6, Andrea Johnson, PhD3, Yunping Ping, PhD2, Stephen Stemkowski, PhD2 and Mark Monane, MD7, (1)NYU School of Medicine, NY, NY, (2)Comprehensive Health Insights, Inc, Lousiville, KY, (3)CardioDx, Palo Alto, CA, (4)Comprehensive Physician Associates, Youngstown, OH, (5)Maringouin Medical Center, Maringouin, LA, (6)Triangle Primary Care, Wake Forest, NC, (7)CardioDx, Inc., Palo Alto, CA
Purpose: Better methods for the appropriate evaluation of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) are needed to assess the 10,000 patients/day presenting to primary care physician (PCP) offices in the United States, accounting for $5 billion/year in diagnostic testing costs. The objective of this study was to measure the effect of a personalized genomic-based, gene expression score (GES) on medical decision making by PCPs.

Methods: The GES is a validated quantitative diagnostic test for non-diabetic patients that measures expression levels of 23 genes from peripheral blood to determine the likelihood of a symptomatic patient having obstructive CAD, as defined by at least one vessel with > 50% coronary artery stenosis by quantitative coronary angiography or core-lab computed tomography (CT) angiography.  The GES has a negative predictive value of 96% among low GES (≤ 15) patients. Between April 2012 to January 2013, a total of 344 stable patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of obstructive CAD at 6 community-based PCP practices had a peripheral blood sample drawn for gene expression measurement, which was sent to a central reference lab and reported within 2-3 days.The primary outcome is the association between GES results and referrals to noninvasive and invasive cardiac testing.


Results: Of the 342 evaluable patients, the median age was 55 years, 53% were female, the mean (SD) GES was 16 (±10), and 49% of patients had low GES.  Patients presented with typical and atypical symptoms (93%), were asymptomatic with >3 risk factors (5%), or were asymptomatic with <3 risk factors for CAD (2%). After adjusting for age, gender, and type of chest pain, each 10-point decrease in the GES was associated with a 13 fold decrease in the likelihood of referral to further cardiac testing (p<0.0001).  Additionally, patients with low GES had a 94% decrease in the likelihood of referral  versus patients with non-low GES (p<0.0001). At 30 days of follow-up, no major adverse cardiac events were noted.


Conclusions:   This novel genomic-based, personalized gene expression score was incorporated into medical decision making in primary care practice. The test demonstrated clinical utility as a rule-out test, with low GES patients being significantly less likely to be referred for further diagnostic evaluation to rule out obstructive CAD.