PS2-45
HEALTH UTILITIES IN MARGINALIZED CHRONIC HEPATITIS C PATIENTS PARTICIPATING IN A COMMUNITY-BASED HEPATITIS C PROGRAM
To obtain health utilities from chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients participating in a community-based hepatitis C program who are experiencing significant social and economic marginalization. This population has previously been underrepresented in utility studies and economic analyses.
Method:
In this ongoing pilot study, we are measuring the health utilities of 129 CHC patients participating in the Toronto Community Hepatitis C Program (TCHCP) at three community health centres in Toronto, Ontario from February to October, 2015.
The TCHCP is a unique community-based interprofessional program aimed at providing hepatitis C treatment, support, and education to individuals who have difficulty accessing mainstream (e.g. hospital-based) healthcare due to barriers such as past or current homelessness, low income, alcohol and/or drug use, and mental health issues.
Each patient is being asked to complete the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) and Health Utilities Index Mark 2/3 (HUI2/HUI3) as well as provide demographic and clinical information.
Result:
Preliminary data have been collected from 68 patients to date. Most patients reported a history of injection drug use. The mean (standard error) utilities were: EQ-5D=0.701 (0.026); HUI2=0.709 (0.025); and HUI3=0.528 (0.040).
Utilities were also estimated separately for different subpopulations based on severity of liver disease. A regression model was formulated to assess the effects of socio-demographic and clinical variables on utilities.
Conclusion:
Our preliminary results suggest that marginalized CHC patients have lower utilities than those previously reported in the literature for CHC patients. For example, a 2008 systematic review by McLernon et al. found mean utilities of: EQ-5D=0.747; HUI2=0.823; and HUI3=0.741 for patients with moderate CHC.
This disparity is likely due to the fact that previous utility studies have been conducted in tertiary care settings which serve primarily middle-class patients and are less likely to be accessed by patients from disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds. This is a major limitation because marginalized patients, including those who use intravenous drugs, comprise a large body of CHC patients.
With many promising but costly new treatments recently becoming available for CHC, it will be important to evaluate their cost-effectiveness with the inclusion of this previously underrepresented patient demographic. Our findings will increase the accuracy of economic evaluations of hepatitis C screening and treatment by providing utility data that is more reflective of the affected population.