PS 4-6
COMPARING PHYSICIANS' AND PATIENTS' EXPECTATIONS FOR ANTIBIOTICS: A STUDY ACROSS MULTIPLE SAMPLES
Method: We surveyed 149 healthcare providers (47% female; 74% White) recruited from two large urban academic hospital emergency departments in the Mid-Atlantic region between May 19th and December 26th, 2015, and 224 patients (61% female; 56% African-American) from one of the emergency departments between April and July 2015. All subjects answered 46 Likert scale questions measuring providers’, or patients’, mental representations, 2 yes/no questions measuring patients’ expectations for antibiotics, and 2 free response questions measuring patients’ knowledge regarding antibiotic prescribing. Analysis was conducted using exploratory factor analysis (EFA).
Results: The “Why Not Take a Risk” gist captured significant unique variance across both provider (13% of variance) and patient (16% of variance) samples. Separate factors captured other relevant gists such as the possibility of harm from side effects (10% of variance for providers; 9% of variance for patients) and that antibiotics might not be safe (6% of variance for providers; 11% of variance for patients). Patients (6% of variance), but not providers, endorsed a gist indicating that antibiotics work against viruses.
Conclusion: Both patients and providers utilize “Why Not Take a Risk?” – a widespread strategy that is associated with categorical risk perceptions rather than verbatim analysis. Although individually rational, reliance on this gist can lead to socially suboptimal results including antibiotic resistance. These perceptions are associated with physicians’ expectations for antibiotics which can affect their prescribing. Additionally, patients’ expectations have been shown to drive physician behavior. Thus, “Why Not Take a Risk?” may be a strong driver of overprescribing behavior, suggesting opportunities for public health communication interventions and physician education.